Since the fall of the Roman Empire and with the emergence of various branches of Islam, the entire Middle East, from Byzantium to Baghdad and from Edessa to Cairo, was nothing but a huge cauldron boiling with fratricidal struggles and civil wars, conquests and defeats.
Jerusalem, a holy city for Jews, Christians and Muslims, was accessible and open to all pilgrims. Until the mid-11th century, Jerusalem was under the authority of the Fatimid sultans of Cairo. Christian pilgrims were tolerated in the holy city. Problems existed but were endured.
The second half of the 11th century saw the arrival of the Seljuk Turks from their steppes in Central Asia. They took advantage of internal struggles and divisions among the Arab lords to settle in the region. In 1071, they captured the city of Jerusalem. The Christians living in the city, as well as pilgrims, were then subjected to increasingly cruel abuses. This was one of the many factors that triggered what History would come to call "the Crusades".
Contrary to popular belief, there were not only nine "Great Crusades" organised to conquer Jerusalem, liberate Christ's tomb and defend the Latin states of the Holy Lands. Other crusades were organised to fight in countries and regions that were sometimes quite surprising. The crusade then took on the full meaning of its definition: "A military expedition with a religious purpose".
Even less categorical in terms of facts than the Muslim crusades, the Nordic crusades, like the Reconquista, can be considered as a single great war, which began in the 11th century and ended in 1410 with the crushing defeat of the Teutonic Order at Tannenberg (Grundvald).
The Reconquista, meanwhile, began in the 8th century, continued and intensified in the 11th and 12th centuries, and ended in 1492 with the fall of Granada. Like the Northern Crusades, it can be considered not as a series of expeditions, but as a single war lasting several centuries.
....
Important notice :
All the information you will find on these pages is for reference purposes only, based on accounts and information found in the literature. It is not a rewriting of history.
For example, specialist authors do not seem to agree among themselves on the number of masters of the Order of the Temple, the dates of their magisteriums, and many other details, even more general ones...
If you have any comments, suggestions or corrections, please do not hesitate to contact me, merci .